Open data in Finland – Part II

Bottom up and middle out, but not yet from top down

European Public Sector Information Platform Topic Report No.12 (originally published 15 July 2010 at http://www.epsiplatform.eu/topic_reports/ )


Go back to Part I ->

State of actions: Building capacity

Data itself is not interesting for most of the people, including the politicians and civil servants. It is the real applications using government data that are noticed. Without data, however, it would be difficult to create solutions that prove the benefits.

The first Apps for Democracy Finland competition was arranged in 2009 with the goal of finding show cases and new uses for information provided by public administration. The competition followed the tradition of similar contests in many other countries. In Finland it seemed to have a positive impact in the discussion about re-using public sector information.

The contest as a concrete event brought different stakeholders together. The organisations and individuals (public institutions, companies, researchers and citizens) that were involved in the 2009 competition are still very much driving the movement of PSI reuse in Finland.

For example:

  • (Co-organizer of the contest) the public service portal Suomi.fi is currently hosting and developing the Finnish data.gov style national data catalogue data.suomi.fi[9]
  • (Sponsor of the contest) the Libraries.fi portal have just released the catalogue meta data of all 680 000 items that can be found in the Helsinki region (Helsinki, Espoo, Vantaa and Kauniainen) City Libraries.[10]
  • (Represented in the Jury) The Ministry of Transport and Communications has published a guidebook about open data for the public sector organizations.[11]
  • (Co-organizer of the contest) Forum Virium Helsinki (a regional development organisation) is running the ambitious Helsinki Region Infoshare project.[12]
  • (Winner of the apps contest idea category) Peter Tattersall is developing the TaxTree idea [13] further and aiming to start a company.

These are just few indirect results of a rather small competition with 23 participants and a total of 13.000€ prize money. Many other groups and individuals who were involved are also continuing to contribute to the emergence and development of the Finnish open data ecosystem.

llustration 1: The winner of the Ideas category in the Apps for Democracy Finland 2009 competition, Tax Tree by Peter Tattersall, visualises public administration budgeting with an easy-to-grasp tree metaphor. The roots of the tree represent budget income from different taxes. The tax money flows into the trunk of the tree and spreads to the branches that represent expenses. Finally the leafs and fruits are the achieved benefits from the public spending. The width of the roots and branches represent the amount of income and expenses. The Apps for Democracy Finland competition had two categories: one for ideas and a second one for implemented applications. This was because of the fact that there are still not enough open datasets in Finland so that the competition could focus solely on the applications.

During the past year numerous data catalogues around the world have been launched. Most well known ones are the national level catalogues in UK and USA. Also many regional, citywide, thematic and independently run catalogues are up and running already and many more initiatives are under development.

A question raised by all this catalogue development work is how the interoperability of the different data catalogues could be achieved so that the national, regional and independent catalogues could produce together a universal, but distributed open government data catalogue. In Europe the issues of data catalogue interoperability was discussed in the ePSIplus Network “towards a pan-European PSI registry” meeting[14] and more in the recent topic report by Rob Davies[15].

In Finland there are currently four groups that are developing data catalogues for different purposes:

  • The national data catalogue data.suomi.fi
  • Helsinki Region Infoshare project is preparing to deploy a regional data catalogue and working to establish a clearing house concept to support a partnership between 14 municipalities in the capital region to harmonize and publish their information resources.
  • The Finnish Network Democracy Association will soon launch a developer oriented independent catalogue which would include also metadata of known, but not yet open public sector data sources and also useful data outside of the public sector.
  • The Semantic Computing Research Group (SECO) of Aalto University develops tools (including catalogue) to publish and re-use public sector data following the Linked Data concept.

Finland is in a good position to develop solutions for interoperability on the technical and practical level since the above mentioned four projects are being developed at the same time. All of these projects are independent, but the development goes on iteratively and in loosely coupled collaboration.

Challenges and bottlenecks

The Finnish FOI legislation requires that public documents are open, but does not say anything about the technical and legal re-usability of the data. The Act on Criteria for Charges Payable to the State (150/1992) stipulates that in many cases, there is a charge for the use of public sector data.

Finland has a long history of freedom of information (FOI) legislation, which dates back to the world’s first FOI legislation adopted by the Swedish parliament in 1766, when Finland was part of Sweden.[16]

Finland’s FOI regulation has on a number of occasions been referred to as an example of good practice. However, Treating PSI re-use as an extension of freedom of information issue has not led to significant progress in actual opening up of the public sector data resources.

In practice, most organisations make the information in their databases available on their websites or as publications and documents, but they do not publish the data itself. The distribution of data is often neglected, while organisations focus on fulfilling their obligations to publish documents.

In many cases, the decision of publishing a dataset openly falls in between the traditional roles and responsibilities of officials within public sector organisations. Those who technically understand opening data sources (the IT department) are typically not authorised to make decisions about the content, those who are usually responsible for publishing information (the communications department) may not understand at the first hand how publishing data in legally and technically re-usable form differs from publishing documents on the organization’s web portal.

Conclusions

The author of the topic report from Norway, Olav Anders Øvrebø said that the Scandinavian countries are potential open data champions. His comment is based on the favourable conditions including good quality public registries, long history in transparent governance and the FOI legislation. I must agree with this positive view about the potential, but at the same time admit that the potential is still far from being fulfilled in Finland.

During 2009 and 2010 we have been witnessing in Finland as in many other countries newly raised awareness of the possibilities offered by public sector data. I call this open data movement as the second wave in the discussion on the access to and re-usability of public sector information.

Better public visibility of the topic, including the international examples of data catalogues, applications and innovation contests has boosted the debate and activity in Finland. The open data ecosystem is getting more powerful and more people from politicians to public administrators, entrepreneurs and active citizens are joining forces.

In order to raise public and political interest in opening the data resources it is crucial to see the potential of PSI from wider societal and democratic perspective rather than merely from the economic “open information market” -perspective.

On the other hand, the needed decisions, which will change the funding models of some public organizations and division of labour between public and private actors will need a solid economic case.

It may be that the current wave of public enthusiasm will pass before the real benefits of open public data appear. Hopefully the debate which has started and actions are strong enough to cause permanent structural changes so that the social, democratic and economic benefits will be seen in the future.

[9] Suomi.fi. (2009). Finnish national data catalogue. Finnish service portal Suomi.fi. http://www.data.fi.

[10] Libraries.fi. (2010). Catalogue meta data Helsinki region city libraries. http://data.kirjastot.fi/

[11] Poikola, A., Kola, P., & Hintikka, K. A. (2010). Julkinen data. Publication of the Ministry of Transport and Communications. http://www.julkinendata.fi/

[12] Forum Virium Helsinki (2010). Helsinki Region Infoshare. http://www.forumvirium.fi/en/project-areas/smart-city/helsinki-region-infoshare.

[13] Tattersall, P. (2009). The Tax Tree (presentation). Slideshare. http://www.slideshare.net/ptatters/tax-tree

[14] Green, B. (2009). Thematic Meeting Report PSI Asset Registers: towards a pan-European PSI registry http://www.epsiplatform.eu/psi_library/reports/epsiplus_thematic_psi_re_use_meeting_reports_2006_to_2009/information_management_standards_meeting_3_report

[15] Davies, R (2010). PSI Portals: Overview of Progress (Part 1) http://www.epsiplatform.eu/topic_reports/topic_report_no_8_psi_portals_overview_of_progress_part_1

[16] Mustonen, J. (2006). The World’s First Freedom of Information Act. Anders Chydenius Foundation (p. 103). Anders Chydenius Foundation. http://www.access-info.org/documents/Access_Docs/Thinking/Get_Connected/worlds_first_foia.pdf

5 responses to “Open data in Finland – Part II

  1. Pingback: Open data in Finland – Part I « apoikola

  2. Hey, just want to let you know I enjoy the site. Keep it up.

  3. Yes, this is really incredible interesting. The potential of this initiative is far beyond my grasp of imagination. Sweden next in line? Good work!

  4. Pingback: Apéruche VizThink : datajournalisme et visualisation | Le blog de l'association BUG – Rennes

  5. Pingback: Apéruche VizThink : datajournalisme et outils de visualisation | Le blog de l'association BUG – Rennes

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s